Re: [dita] DITA 2.0 terminology as glossary topics

I think it's a good idea and would be willing to help. We might discover some additional needs for glossary redesign this way, too.

--Scott
Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 14, 2020, at 7:24 AM, Dr. Stanley Doherty <> wrote:
> 
> ïHi --
> 
> I am completing a formal glossary of DITA terminology for an Oracle DITA authoring spec. As has been mentioned in TC meetings in the past, our own TC terminology resides in <dlentry>s in separate terminology topics, not in glossentry topics. 
> 
> <topicref href="../archSpec/base/dita-terminology.dita">
>  <topicref href="../archSpec/base/normative-and-non-normative-information.dita"/>
>  <topicref href="../archSpec/base/notation.dita"/>
>  <topicref href="../archSpec/base/basic-dita-terminology.dita"/>
>  <topicref href="../archSpec/base/specialization-terminology.dita"/>
>  <topicref href="../archSpec/base/dita-modules.dita"/>
>  <topicref href="../archSpec/base/linking-and-addressing-terms.dita"/>
>  <topicref href="../archSpec/base/key-terminology.dita"/>
>  <topicref href="../archSpec/base/map-terminology.dita"/>
>  <topicref href="../archSpec/base/fileext.dita"/>
>    </topicref>
> 
> Just testing the waters. Is it time to implement that same content in glossentry topics? If interest is there, I'll volunteer to work on it solo or with someone.
> 
> What's the temperature in the room?
> 
> :-)
> 
> Stan