← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
Allowing <draft-comment> in more places
Following up on an action item from today's TC call:
On 17 December, we discussed an e-mail on dita-comment. One of
the requests was to allow <draft-comment> in
<refbody>. We were OK with this, but deferred deciding how
to handle -- bug fix was suggested -- until we had looked at the
troubleshooting topic to see if there were elements in that
structure that also needed <draft-comment>.
So, I think we are looking at permitting <draft-comment> in
the following topic types/elements:
reference/<refbody>
troubleshooting/<remedy>
I can at least elaborate on the use case that I see for the
troubleshooting topic:
Allows a place to insert a <draft-comment> that applies
to the <remedy> element, especially in the following
circumstances:
<remedy> constrained to remove
<responsibleParty>
<title> constrained to remove <draft-comment>
and other elements
--
Best,
Kris
Kristen James Eberlein
Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting
www.eberleinconsulting.com
+1 919 622-1501; kriseberlein (skype)
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →