← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

Allowing <draft-comment> in more places

From
Kristen James Eberlein <>
Date
2020-01-28T19:07:05+00:00
ID
Thread
Allowing <draft-comment> in more places
Following up on an action item from today's TC call:

    
On 17 December, we discussed an e-mail on dita-comment. One of
      the requests was to allow <draft-comment> in
      <refbody>. We were OK with this, but deferred deciding how
      to handle -- bug fix was suggested -- until we had looked at the
      troubleshooting topic to see if there were elements in that
      structure that also needed <draft-comment>.

    
So, I think we are looking at permitting <draft-comment> in
      the following topic types/elements:

    
      
reference/<refbody>

      
troubleshooting/<remedy>

    
    
I can at least elaborate on the use case that I see for the
      troubleshooting topic:

    
      
Allows a place to insert a <draft-comment> that applies
        to the <remedy> element, especially in the following
        circumstances:

      
        
<remedy> constrained to remove
          <responsibleParty>

        
<title> constrained to remove <draft-comment>
          and other elements

        

      
    
    
-- 

      Best,

      Kris

      

      Kristen James Eberlein

      Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee

      Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting

      www.eberleinconsulting.com

      +1 919 622-1501; kriseberlein (skype)
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →