Ian Castle writes:
> Currently, passivetex is probably happier sat on top of the TeXlive
> distro. Which I don't have - and isn't RPM based which is important to
I am working on that :-}
> Passivetex is perhaps more "arcane" than jadetex - either way, it
I dont agree. it does not have the bizarre intermediate representation
to fight with
> likely that fop will develop quicker as it has a fairly active
> development community... does anyone other than Sebastian work on
> passivetex?
not really. yes, FOP moves faster
> Currently, I consider the DSSSL toolchain to be in "stable, maintenance"
> mode, while active development and future leaps in functionality will
> come with the continuing development of the XSL toolchain.
I'd concur with that
sebastian
