← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Missing CDATA sections
/ fyl2xp1 <> was heard to say: | If I process this file: | | <?xml version="1.0"?> | <!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.1.2//EN" "c:/docbook/docbkx412/docbookx.dtd"> | <article> | <sect1><title>Error Prone</title> | <![CDATA[ | Im going to dissapear! | ]]> | <para> | Yes that's right ladies and gentlemen, CDATA is gone! | </para> | </sect1> | </article> | | with /docbook-xsl-1.52.2/profiling/profile.xsl using xsltproc | it generates | | <?xml version="1.0"?> | <!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.1.2//EN" "http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.0/docbookx.dtd"> | <article> | <sect1><title>Error Prone</title> | | Im going to dissapear! | | <para> | Yes that's right ladies and gentlemen, CDATA is gone! | </para> | </sect1> | </article> | | which is not even valid XML, why is CDATA going missing, is this an xsltproc or | style-sheet issue? Uhm, it wasn't valid with the CDATA section marker either, so I'm confused. <![CDATA[ is effectively a typing shortcut for character escaping. It has *no* semantic meaning. It isn't even preserved in the XML infoset. <![CDATA[<]]> and < are semantically *identical*. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <> | If we could read the secret http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | history of our enemies, we should Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | find in in each one's life sorrow | and suffering enough to disarm all | hostility.--H. W. Longfellow
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →