Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: FO stylesheets compatibility with PassiveTex andFop

At 12:10 07/09/2002, Alex Lancaster wrote:

>Ah!  XEP!  I thought so.  That's part of RenderX right?  I figured you
>must be using something other than Fop and PassiveTeX, since both Fop
>and PassiveTeX are lagging in their implementations of the XSL-FO spec
>somewhat. 

I'd rather the stylesheets be compliant with the spec (XSL-FO)
than single vendor aligned, whether open src or commercial.
I'd agree that XEP + Antenna House are the most compliant today,
hence it seems right that that's what Norm is using?

Regards DaveP