If you're going to be adding an FAQ on this, why don't you just explain the
entire filename logic for chunked files?
With use.id.as.filename:
1. dbhtml filename="name"
2. ID
3. bk??ch??s??
Without use.id.as.filename:
1. dbhtml
2. bk??ch??s??
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Pawson [mailto:]
> Sent: Friday, April 18, 2003 5:16 AM
> To: Steinar Bang;
> Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Re: Chunked HTML file names too long for
> ISO9660
>
>
> At 09:03 18/04/2003 +0200, Steinar Bang wrote:
>
>
> >Well, personally I'm aware of the problem, and therefore keep my ids
> >short, and test the resulting chunked HTML on Win32 before releasing.
> >But it might bite someone else.
> >
> >Perhaps something for Dave Pawson's FAQ? (it seems to be down right
> >now, so I couldn't check if it already had something there)
>
> Been down for 24 hours now. Its the isp.
>
> Can I check I've got this right?
> Using id values for filenames in xslt output could screw those
> using 8.3 filenames?
>
> Whilst talking about this, David Carlisle pointed out to me
> the downside of
> using generate-id() targets, could change etc, not reliable.
> I could see his point, just wondered if anyone else has been
> bitten by
> this problem?
> Should it be frowned upon?
>
> regards DaveP
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:
>
>
>
>
