Jeff:
That's far from it... accessibility guidelines call to make accomodations
for everyone and doing universal design, not just what's more convenient for
me at the time. I am not a disabled user but have come to appreciate the
advantage of having a screen reader while i'm engaged in other activities.
While a table may be the best way to represent a matrix, accessibility
technology requires you to do a lot more work than you normally would, see
http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/#gl-table-markup
I'd also go one more on Dave's suggestion. Download a copy of IBM homepage
reader or JAWS and have them read the generated page to you without any
modification and see if that makes any difference... I can guarantee you
it'll be a completely different experience than just looking at the pagee.
Tables are usually the wors offenders :)
If there's enough interested, I'd like to propose an accessibility
evaluation of the Stylesheets and a set of guidelines/recomendations for
stylesheets customizers
Carlos
--
Carlos E. Araya
(Soon to be ex) WebCT Administrator - Trainer
California Virtual Campus, Region 1
C/O De Anza College
21250 Stevens Creek Blvd.
Cupertino, CA 95014
(p) 408 257 0482 (f) 408 255 4406
<icq> 5140783 <aim>carlosed1974
web (work): http://www.cvc1.org
web (personal): http://silverwolf-net.net/
Sig:
Computers are like airconditioners: They stop working properly if you open
windows.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Beal" <>
To: "'Dave Pawson'" <>; "Steinar Bang" <>;
<>
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 09:16
Subject: RE: [docbook] Re: Tables, braille and other stuff
> > Why Steinar?
> > Because you can visually scan n columns/rows quickly?
> > Take care when you deliver material to those whose access methods
> > are serial.
> > They perhaps can't scan them so quickly.
> > A table, one cell at a time, is pretty hard work, and tiring
> > on the brain :-)
> > regards DaveP
>
>
> Pardon my ignorance for a moment, but do accessibility guidelines suggest
> that we make our information less accessible for the "seeing" population
in
> order to make it more accessible for the "non-seeing" population? Or (as
I
> understand it) do they suggest methods and standards for adding
information
> to our existing data for alternate presentation?
>
> Jeff
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:
>
>
