On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 02:04:20PM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote:
> > groff, but actually my XML uses refsect1s. Looks like refsections
> > aren't handled yet. :-(
>
> double yuk. did you report the bug?
I checked in a fix to CVS earlier today.
> i.e., every option is printed twice!
Fixed in CVS; stupid bug (my fault) introduced by merging patches.
> how are groff comments marked? from '\n.\"' to '\n'?
> no multiline comments? triple yuk!
Yes, I think so.
> > Of course you can split them into lines in the template.
>
> how?
Using substring-before and a recursive template. But I imagine that
there will be situations where you might want a comment in the XML but
where a forced line break in the output would cause bad effects. YMMV
though, and you get to choose where you put your comments. :-)
Tim.
*/
