Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [docbook-apps] Any way to keep <!DOCTYPE...> definition int o utput of XSLT transformation?

From
Daniel Veillard <>
Date
2003-07-26T13:46:27+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [docbook-apps] Any way to keep <!DOCTYPE...> definition int o utput of XSLT transformation?
On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 07:16:24AM +0100, Dave Pawson wrote:
> At 16:05 25/07/2003 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> >fix this in any future version of xsltproc. You cannot generate an internal
> >subset with XSLT,
> 
> 
> http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl/sect2/N2281.html#d2816e181
> 
> shows one way round it.

  Right, you may even be able to generate the specific DTD within the
stylesheet using the exslt:document extension, this sounds far cleaner than
trying to play with xsl:text to try to generate an internal subset.

> I've used DOE in the past.

  Hum, what does DOE maps to in this context ?

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
Next in thread → Next in month →