You have my sympathy. It's no fun these days to comply to the recs and
working drafts.
I think I can articulate the sorry state of xpointer() a bit more for those
that perceive this as a mere implementation issue.
XInclude depends on XPointer depends on XPath; more trouble to come with
XPath 2.0, which relies on W3C XML Schema; i.e., if I understand this
correctly, simple inclusion of document fragment will require a PSVI for the
including document. It'll get hard to avoid W3C XML Schema processing even
when you don't really need it ;(
Keep up the good work anyway ;)
kind regards
Peter Ring
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Veillard [mailto:]
Sent: 2. februar 2004 10:36
To: David Tolpin
Cc:
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Using XIncludes to include infosets
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 01:12:11PM +0400, David Tolpin wrote:
> >
> > Oh well, I guess we can all live with entity references for a
> > lot longer:-)
>
> What's wrong with jd.xslt/jd.xinclude?
Okay, enough attacks, I'm done, there is no fun left, I need a break...
I'm unsubscribing the DocBook lists like I did on the xsl-list, people
interested knows they can reach me on the gnome.org lists.
Daniel
