On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 16:04, Dave Pawson wrote:
> Then surely your index term processing is to mark up
> the contents in all needed combinations (additional markup),
> then pass through generating one additional index entry
> in the content for each combination?
> final run is normal docbook processing?
>
> perhaps <cmd>....</cmd> <term /> and <concept/>
> could be the internal markup?
> Since I guess you dont want a fully permuted index as per your
> example it seems like a manual intervention solution is called for.
I was hoping there was an easier way, I will give it a try over the
weekend. <May tell my boss to stuff it, but that would not be a 'nice'
thing to do>
Thank you
Riaan
