Michael Smith wrote:
> I agree completely with everything you've written. The problem I
> have is with the idea of mixing tt and code or mixing b and i with
> strong and em. We should do one or the other.
I see. The question is what is worse -- mixing tt with em and strong or
semantic misuse of code? I don't know.
> There were a couple of open feature requests asking for b and i
> output be changed to strong and em, and for tt to be changed to
> code. And we seemed to have a consensus that those were not bad
> ideas. So the changes were made.
I know and I have nothing against these changes. I think that it doesn't
matter at all, because there are classes on almost all elements
generated from inline markup so one can customize rendering with CSS.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jirka Kosek e-mail: http://www.kosek.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
Profesionální školení a poradenství v oblasti technologií XML.
Podívejte se na náš nově spuštěný web http://DocBook.cz
Podrobný přehled školení http://xmlguru.cz/skoleni/
------------------------------------------------------------------
