Hi Dave,
I'm all for the 'lazy' method... ;>
I'll give it a go and see how this approach affects processing time.
Thanks again,
Chris
Chris Johnson
Web Developer
Capilano College
North Vancouver, Canada
604.986.1911 ext. 3455
>>> Dave Pawson <> 06/05/2005 10:20:47 am >>>
On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 09:56 -0700, Chris Johnson wrote:
> Mike, Dave,
>
> This seems like a sensible way to go, but what if you have more than
> 200 or so entities? I'm working on a document that uses at least
this
> many, and they are re-generated from a database extract (along with
the
> entity driver files)... I have been happy with this approach to date
but
> now I'm working in a .NET environment, and I'll have to move from DTD
to
> schema and/or schema + internal DTD subset...
>
> Any other thoughts on this?
I manually generated the entity name and its text equivalent.
With 200, and being lazy, I would get the computer to help me
(I'm sure Michael would too!)
Use the same approach, just generate the entity definitions
or xslt processing for Michaels solution, by a program.
The idea is still good
HTH DaveP
