Euis Luhuanam <> writes:
> It seems that the "XSL/FO path" is better maintained; but it is
> recommended not for non-tech fellows (like myself).
> Whereas the "DSSSL/jade/jadetex path" is more mature;
> but "not so" maintained anymore (?)
The DSSSL/jade/jadetex path is also not more mature, if by
"mature" you mean "better" and not just "old".
The current open-source XSL-FO engines may not be mature, but
there are non-open-source XSL-FO engines that are very mature. One
of them, XEP, is even no-cost, as long as you are using it for
non-commercial purposes (like, say, producing documentation for
open-source applications).
--Mike
