Stephane Bortzmeyer <> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 11:52:18AM +0900,
> Michael Smith <> wrote
> a message of 75 lines which said:
>
> > The DSSSL/jade/jadetex path is also not more mature, if by "mature"
> > you mean "better" and not just "old".
>
> Well, I can produce a "reasonable" PDF file from Docbook/XML with
> DSSSL/jade/jadetex and I still cannot do it with the XSLT/FO
> way.
I can. So can you. Look back at the part of my original message
that you forgot to quote here.
> That's what "mature" means for me.
>
> (Before people tell me I should install the latest Sun's JRE, I add
> that using only free software is a pre-requisite.)
A pre-requisite for whom?
