Hi Dave,
> I like the idea Nikolai, but Firefox doesn't have SVG natively (as yet).
> When its native it would be far more convenient.
You are right: I neglected the HTML output. However, it still might be
a feasible option for FO output: enough processors now support SVG.
The quality requirements are also higher for printed matter, so having
vector stuff in PDF instead of bitmaps looks like a good thing.
> How hard would it be to capture them in a png format from
> the generated SVG?
Batik has the tool: http://xml.apache.org/batik/svgrasterizer.html.
Regards,
Nikolai Grigoriev
