I would love to use FOP - but have not found a way to seperate it from
it's non-free Java implementation. [1] What a shamel, it looks good
otherwise.
[1] http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html
On 1/29/06, Thomas Schraitle <> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sunday 29 January 2006 15:34, Noah Slater wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > Have you tried http://xmlroff.org/ - I havn't used it personaly, but
> > it seems to be the only free alternative to passivetex for FO
> > processing.
>
> I know it but I had tried it long time ago and it was not ready. :)
>
> Of course, the original poster can also try FOP. With the development in
> trunk it seems that the progress is very promising.
>
>
> Tom
>
> --
> Thomas Schraitle
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:
>
>
--
"Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so
far as society is free to use the results." - R. Stallman
