Next in thread →
Next in month →
Re: [docbook] DocBook list items display with extra line break using FO XSL
Thanks Bob, Slowly I was getting this impression my self. After playing with xmlroff and finding it not to work at all for me I almost gave up hope on finding a free (as in speech) package for transforming DocBook to PDF. That is, until I discovered dblatex which provides everything I need and more - it's faster too for PDF generation than the usual XML -> FO -> PDF route. Thanks, Noah On 2/1/06, Bob Stayton <> wrote: > I'm not sure if anyone else mentioned this, but support for PassiveTeX in > the DocBook XSL stylesheets has been discontinued. PassiveTeX implements > too little of the XSL-FO standard, and is not being actively developed. I > recommend you try another FO processor. > > Bob Stayton > Sagehill Enterprises > DocBook Consulting > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Noah Slater" <> > To: "docbook-apps" <>; > <> > Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2006 2:16 PM > Subject: [docbook] DocBook list items display with extra line break using FO > XSL > > > Hi, > > Sorry, for the cross post - I didn't know which list this belongs in. > > Using the standard FO xsl to transform a simple document via > passivetex I notice that list items end up with two <fo:block> > elements around them. This results in some odd display issues as you > can see from the attached screenshot. > > Does anyone know what is going on here? Are the two block items > intentional and processor is messing up conversion, or do the > stylesheets need changing? > > Thank you, > Noah > > -- > "Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so > far as society is free to use the results." - R. Stallman > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---- > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > -- "Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so far as society is free to use the results." - R. Stallman
Next in thread →
Next in month →