>Bob Stayton wrote:
>
>>The case when there is no matching target should not generate an
>>error message because such a match is not required. The problem,
>>of course, is trying to guess when a target was intended but none
>>was found because of a typo. Since this is PCDATA, I don't think
>>there is any way to tell. I usually recommend people use xref
>>directly if they want a link that can be verified.
>
>Yes, indeed. But in scientific publishing it is usually more
>convenient to use abbrev/citation then @id/xref. Anyway I removed
>warning and put FO code into shape with HTML code.
>
> Jirka
Thanks Jirka, but surely in scientific publishing it is more
appropriate to use <biblioref> which is completely unambiguous
--
Ron Catterall, Phd, DSc email:
Prolongacion de Hidalgo 140 http://catterall.net/
San Felipe del Agua tel: +52 951 520 1821
Oaxaca 68020 Mexico fax: +1 530 348 8309
