Richard wrote:
> Thank you to all who replied so far.
>
>> [DaveP] How about updating your setup first?
>
> In this case, the stylesheets version is not the culprit. I tried with
> the latest SourceForge.net release [1.73.2] just now to make sure,
> and the relevant HTML is identical.
> To iterate: even using the param(s) I mentioned in the message
> you
> replied to, the doctype is omitted (including with v1.73.2).
Are you saying that is an accessibility issue, or an HTML validity issue?
>
> You asked for specific examples and details on the other points. I'm a
> little confused
> as I tried to include some in the original mail? I'm more than happy to
> re-write
> those parts if they don't make the issues clear. Just to check please:
> It sounds as if those parts may not have come through for you? They
> show on the list web archives
> [http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/docbook/200710/msg00013.html]
Sorry Richard. I hadn't connected the two emails. One about
developing using XSLT, the other about accessibility and validity.
My bad. Ian S. Worthington is the author? You sign yourself Richard.
I guess there's some confusion here.
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
