Re: [docbook-apps] FO processor support

Hi,

Norman Walsh wrote:
> As I work on porting the XSLT 1.0 stylesheets to XSLT 2.0, I find
> workarounds, mostly for FOP and PassiveTeX scattered throughout. Does
> anyone know if these are still necessary?

I had a look at the 1.73.2 stylesheets and can provide some details 
about the workarounds still needed by the FOP 1.x branch (version 0.93 
and later). Having found no development targetted list on Sourceforge 
I guess this list is the appropriate one.

I worked from the released 1.73.2 version of the stylesheets. I made 
a grep for ‘fop.extensions’ in the fo/*.xsl files and the line numbers 
given below correspond to the lines where this term was found. If for 
whatever reason the lines don’t match they can be retrieved by searching 
for ‘fop.extensions’ from the beginning of each file.

There’s nothing to add that’s specific to the fop1.extensions parameter; 
this means that, either the fop.extensions parameter is present at the 
same place and the comment available for this parameter also applies to 
the fop1 parameter. Or the specific behaviour that’s implemented at that  
place must be kepts as is.

The results are in the attached text file. If there’s any question, just 
ask.

I hope this helps,
Vincent


-- 
Vincent Hennebert                            Anyware Technologies
http://people.apache.org/~vhennebert         http://www.anyware-tech.com
Apache FOP Committer                         FOP Development/Consulting