Elizabeth,
DocBook has a profiling capability that should do what
you want. It's supported by the stylesheets, so you
can make two versions of a document from the same source
and get the correct toc for each automatically.
Check out this section from Bob Stayton's book: DocBook
XSL: The Complete Guide:
http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/Profiling.html
Dick Hamilton
> -----Original Message-----
> From: elizabethw [mailto:]
> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 9:54 AM
> To:
> Subject: [docbook-apps] Suppressing toc entries based on role
> attribute
>
>
>
> I wish to generate two slightly different sets of
> documentation from the same
> DocBook XML. I thought I'd achieved this by setting the role
> attribute on
> affected elements, eg:
>
> <sect2 role="not_doc_a" id="something">
> ...content...
> </sect2>
>
> and having two local stylesheets, one which ignores elements
> with the role
> not_doc_a and one which ignores elements with the role not_doc_b.
>
> I had thought that this had worked, but have just noticed that the
> autogenerated toc includes entries for each section,
> regardless of the role.
> Obviously, the links in the toc to suppress sections don't
> work because the
> content isn't there! Is there anyway to suppress toc entries
> for elements
> with a particular role ?
>
> I believe that the toc entry isn't generated when the (eg)
> sect2 element is
> processed - if I include a local empty template for sect2 so the text,
> headings etc disappear, the toc entries remain. So all
> attempts to intercept
> sect2 elements with the correct role are futile - the toc's
> already been
> generated.
>
> I had hoped that overriding generate.toc in my local stylesheet in the
> following way:
>
> <xsl:param name="generate.toc">
> <xsl:choose>
> <xsl:when test="@role='not_doc_a'">
> sect2 nop
> </xsl:when>
> <xsl:when test="@role='not_doc_b'">
> sect2 nop
> </xsl:when>
> <xsl:otherwise>
> ... what it would otherwise be...
> </xsl:otherwise>
> </xsl:choose>
> </xsl:param>
>
> would do The Right Thing, but the toc entries for the missing
> sections are
> still present.
>
> Does anyone know whether what I want to do is possible? If it
> is not, could
> anyone suggest an alternative method of generating my two
> sets of docs which
> won't result in this problem? I'm reluctant to build my toc
> manually unless
> it's absolutely unavoidable.
>
> Thanks, Elizabeth
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Suppressing-toc-entries-based-on-role-at
tribute-tp15950845p15950845.html
Sent from the docbook apps mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:
