wrote:
>> AFAIK there is no 'recommended' way to get mathml (either kind)
>> embedded into docbook... yet.
>
> Yep. What I do is:
>
> - type individual variables and very short equations directly as
> mathml
>
> - type more lengthy math in LaTeX syntax into <textobject role="tex">
> directly into the docbook source, followed by a
>
> <textobject role="html">
> <xi:include href="texmath/whatever.xml"/>
> </textobject>
>
> I have makefile-triggered scripts that create the whatever.xml using
> a standalone TeX-to-MathML converter.
>
> To reduce typing to a minimum, I use emacs-lisp code to create the
> docbook math environments (<[inline]equation> and subtrees).
>
> This setup works very efficiently for me now, but takes some setting
> up.
Yes. Not very general purpose though is it?
Writing in \tex and mathml then using external programs.
I'd like a 'one off' call, which takes docbook + embedded mathml
(namespaced) and produces PDF for say, 80% of input.
With math and its history, I guess there will always
be some 'tweaking' wanted by some users.
I'm assuming that docbook => html with embedded mathl
is another route.
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
