W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Quoting Dave Pawson <>:
>> If it is accepted that 'presentations' are appropriate, then
>> perhaps moving slides to db5 and extending it to provide the markup
>> you want wouldn't be inappropriate. Relax schemas are so nice to work
>> with for extensions.
>>
>> What additional markup is needed? A lot, or just minor additions?
>
> IMHO, only minor additions to standard docbook are needed:
>
> - Some trivial containers like slides, foil and foilgroup with
> title, info, and divcomponentmix elements.
How about looking at the current block levels in db5 and selecting
some 'equivalent' levels? Then propose some names (the ones above
sound good to me)
>
> - An explicit element for speakernotes with divcomponentmix.
Is that just another subdivision? E.g.
<foil>
....
<speakernotes>
</
</foil>
Or do you want speakernotes at a higher level too?
>
> - An attribute for incremental display (lists, graphics),
> but I happily (mis-) use role for that.
Good time to 'do the right thing'?
How about a usable definition of 'incremental display'
Just what to you expect of the html?
>
> Probably I forgot something.
That's the advantage of working on the list :-)
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
