Re: [docbook-apps] docbook testing

Keith Fahlgren wrote:

  Hi,

> That obfuscation tool happens to be easier (ie "possible")
> to write in XSLT2

  BTW, I only see replace() as being XPath 2.0-specific, and this particular usage could be easily rewritten using translate().

> but the rest of the DocBook-XSL stylesheets will stay XSLT
> 1.0 for the time being.

  If I remember correctly, there is a parallel XSLT 2.0 version, isn't there?

  Regards,

-- 
Florent Georges
http://www.fgeorges.org/