Eric Johnson wrote:
> One of the big hurdles for advocating the use of DocBook in “public”
> open source projects is that there are plenty of wiki based alternatives
> that are free, have short learning curves, and do not require
> “building”.
True. There are always easier alternatives.
These still require project effort to generate the documentation though?
That, I think, was the focus of Karens message.
>Developers can easily contribute to the pool of
> documentation. The wiki approach does have some drawbacks
Yes, of course. Most alternatives have some pro's and con's.
As Karen notes, documentation, in docbook, for docbook ....
is weird anyway :-)
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
