Quoting Karen Schneider <>:
> In terms of workflow, assuming there is one person reviewing the XML
> and processing it into HTML, I'm wondering: what gets checked in? The
> HTML... or the XML, and the HTML?
>
You'd check in the XML, as the HTML can always be re-generated from
the XML sources.
> Also, in terms of documenting the transformation process, is there a
> convention for noting in the code what XSL processor was used (and
> what switches, if any)?
>
The simplest approach is to use a transformation script, or, better
yet, a Makefile, to run the transformation. Check that into svn as
well, so you'll always know how your sources were processed at a
particular revision of your svn repository.
just my 2cc
Markus
--
Markus Hoenicka
(Spam-protected email: replace the quadrupeds with "mhoenicka")
http://www.mhoenicka.de
