Hi,
If that's an acceptable option for you, you can use the Trunk version of
FOP in which that bug has been fixed. You can download a snapshot of the
source code here:
http://svn-master.apache.org/snapshots/fop/
And see here for help about building FOP:
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/trunk/compiling.html
HTH,
Vincent
Johannes Katelaan wrote:
> So it's a bug in FOP. Too bad!
> I will have a closer look at the workarounds described in the blog entry and see if it helps in the docbook context.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Johannes
>
> Am 17.11.2009 um 12:23 schrieb Damon Mannion:
>
>> I *think* this is a known limitation to footnotes and FOP?
>>
>> I *think* this is explained here:
>> http://rvdb.wordpress.com/2008/03/07/rendering-footnotes-in-tables-and-lists-with-fop/
>>
>> but am in China at the moment, and access to wordpress seems to be
>> blocked...
>>
>> Damon
>>
>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:01 +0100, "Johannes Katelaan"
>> <> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> if I put a footnote into a list (I tried itemizedlist and variablelist),
>>> then the footnote number will be calculated correctly and will appear in
>>> the text, but the footnote body does not appear at the bottom of the
>>> page. Is this a bug or a feature? Is there a workaround for this?
>>>
>>> Johannes
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:
>
