Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [docbook-publishers] Re: DocBook PublishersSC meeting agenda - 23 Jan 2008

From
Dave Pawson <>
Date
2008-01-23T18:44:05+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [docbook-publishers] Re: DocBook PublishersSC meeting agenda - 23 Jan 2008
On 23/01/2008, Scott Hudson <> wrote:
>
>  Verse might work with more content than stanza.

Stanza is the more general term?

Good suggestion! At this rate, I wonder if we should have the specific
poem element, or have a more general structure that would work for
poetry, dialogue, songs, etc. and subclassed via a type attribute?

Doubtful. I'd suggest either do it properly or leave it so vague as
not to matter, and let users
mark it up using attributes?



>  Also, WRT dialogue, I found an interesting development in the HTML 5 spec:
>
>
>
>
> dialog can be used to mark up a conversation like this:     <dialog>
>  <dt> Costello
>  <dd> Look, you gotta first baseman?
>  <dt> Abbott

> </dialog>
>      Perhaps we want to use a structure that will map easily to this new structure in HTML 5?

This is a tighter version of play class of markup.
And it omits the persona and stage directions?


regards

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Next in thread → Next in month →