clean sample and revised publishers.rnc

Folks,

here is an updated schema to test and a clean sample. I'll work on a 
transform to convert Jon Bosak's Shakespeare in XML so we have more 
samples to work with.

Best regards,

--Scott

*  Scott Hudson*
 / Senior XML Architect/

   
<mailto:>

 

  O:  303.542.2146

  C:  303.332.1883

  F:  303.544.0522

 

  www.FlatironsSolutions.com <http://www.flatironssolutions.com/>

/  An Inc. 500 Company/

/ /



Scott Hudson wrote:
> //Folks,
>
> here's an update on the publishers.rnc. I figured out the error message
> (forgot the element decl for linegroup!).
>
> In my example content, there are some stage directions within the
> dialogue. As such, I think we should allow para in dialogue. Are there
> others that should be allowed? Is there a better pattern that we should
> allow (db.all.blocks or db.para.blocks, perhaps?)
>
> Best regards,
>
> --Scott
>
> Scott Hudson wrote:
>   
>> Folks,
>>
>> still running into some issues with the RNC. Please find the RNC and
>> content sample attached. I'm getting the following errors:
>> Location: 709:24
>> Description: unfinished element "dialogue": "((mediaobject | (line)+ |
>> line))+" required to finish the element
>>
>> Location: 711:36
>> Description: unknown element "linegroup" from namespace
>> "http://docbook.org/ns/docbook"
>>
>> --Scott
>>
>> *  Scott Hudson*
>>  / Senior XML Architect/
>>
>>   
>> <mailto:>
>>
>>
>>
>>   O:  303.542.2146
>>
>>   C:  303.332.1883
>>
>>   F:  303.544.0522
>>
>>
>>
>>   www.FlatironsSolutions.com <http://www.flatironssolutions.com/>
>>
>> /  An Inc. 500 Company/
>>
>> / /
>>
>>
>>
>> Dave Pawson wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> 2008/5/22 Scott Hudson <>:
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Ahem. Looks like we forgot to define where dialogue and poetry should be
>>>> allowed! Try to validate the attached sample and you get:
>>>> unknown element "dialogue" from namespace "http://docbook.org/ns/docbook"
>>>>
>>>> Suggestions?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> Anywhere where a 'major' block can go. Should be as a sibling to the
>>> list elements?
>>> Para won't do, since I can put a para in a list, table cell etc.
>>>
>>> db.nopara.blocks would be right... except it's included in db.para (yuk)
>>> db.all.blocks perhaps
>>> or db.formal.blocks (are they the same class as the 'formal' set? Both
>>> can have titles)
>>>
>>> regards
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dave Pawson
>>> XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
>>> http://www.dpawson.co.uk
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>
>