We probably need to have a meeting on this then. The spec is in public
review until the 23rd, so this could be entered as a public response and
then would have to be changed and enter another draft period. Or, we could
roll this into the next version.
Thoughts?
--Scott
On 7/16/10 3:52 PM, "Keith Fahlgren" <> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Hudson, Scott <> wrote:
>> I thought we made a conscious decision to leave them out in favor of the
>> typically auto-generated method?
>
> I suspect we probably did, but now realize that for already published
> manuscripts, preserving a hardcoded db:toc can be extremely
> attractive, as getting DocBook-XSL to generate exactly what you want
> can be trying.
>
>
> Keith
This transmission is intended only for use by the intended
recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient you should not read, disclose copy, circulate or in any other way use the information contained in this transmission. The information contained in this transmission may be confidential and/or privileged. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this transmission including any attachments.
