Thank you Jirka,
For your explanation. I'm a little surprised that width is possible on docbook
4.5. Is there a other possibility to set the table width in CALS tables
(docbook 5)?
Pierre
Am Dienstag, 5. Juni 2018, 15:07:46 CEST schrieb Jirka Kosek:
> On 5.6.2018 7:58, wrote:
> > _docbook5 apaption:_
> > / <para>
> >
> > <screenshot>/
> >
> > / <info>
> >
> > <title>
> >
> > The map view
> >
> > </title>
> >
> > </info>/
> >
> > / <mediaobject>
> >
> > <imageobject>
> >
> > <imagedata fileref="images/map_view.png" scalefit="1"
> > width="80%" />
> >
> > </imageobject>
> >
> > </mediaobject>/
> >
> > / </screenshot>
> >
> > </para>/
>
> Seems correct. It's not necessary to wrap title inside info element.
>
> > *2.)* My second Problem is that emacs mark "width" in an informaltable as
> > non valid.
> > /<informaltable frame="none" width="80%"> /
> > How do I change this to make it docbook5 compliant?
>
> In DocBook 5.0 you can use either HTML table model or CALS table model.
> In DocBook 4.x you were limited to CALS only. In your example you are
> mixing both models -- width is allowed only in HTML table model, whereas
> frame="none" is allowed in CALS. If you want to use HTML table model you
> have to change to frame="void" as values allowed for frame attribute
> differ between CALS and HTML table models.
>
> Jirka
