RE: [docstandards-interop-tech] Please review the Docstandards InterOp Scenarios and possible venues

Hi Erik,

This is ‘right on!’ I just attended
a major conference and numerous end-users personally expressed the need for these
types of ‘tie-together (my wording)’ standards. Thank you so much
for putting slides to this effort. I really need feedback for a venue or we
will loose our options to demonstrate.

Thanks again!

Dee Schur

Member Support

www.oasis-open.org

 

-----Original Message-----

From: Erik Hennum
[mailto:] 

Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 4:41
PM

To: Dee Schur

Cc: ;
; 

Subject: Re:
[docstandards-interop-tech] Please review the Docstandards InterOp Scenerio and
possible venues

 

Hi, Dee and other Interoperators:

As a possible input for the conversational mill, I'd offer slides 7 through 9
from the following presentation, which summarize a few interoperabilty
opportunities:

http://www.oasis-open.org/events/symposium_2006/slides/Hennum.ppt

Because some of those slides build, they're best viewed in screenshow mode.

(My apologies for the non-standard format -- the conversion tool I tried had
hiccups on the connectors within the graphs. Life during transitional times.)

Hoping that's interesting,

Erik Hennum



"Dee
Schur" <>

 

  
  
"Dee
  Schur" <> 

  
06/20/2006 05:47 AM

  
  
  
   

    
    

    
To

    
    
    

    <>,
    <>

    
   

   

    
    

    
cc

    
    
    

    <>

    
   

   

    
    

    
Subject

    
    
    

    [docstandards-interop-tech]
    Please review the Docstandards InterOp Scenerio and possible venues

    
   

  
  
 

  
   

    
    

    
    
    

    
   

  
  

  
 

Hi Michael,

Yes please set the call for Tuesday 27 or Thursday
29, I find those days to

work best for all and usually 1:00EST seems like a
good time in most time

zones.

The following email was already posted but wanted
to make certain we all

reviewed it, as I think this is a good venue for
our InterOp.

Open Publish 2006

For more information see 

http://open-conferences.com/baltimore .

The show runs Sept. 27-29 in Baltimore. We are
keen to include:

- Adoption of Open Standards in Publishing

- ODF and other Document Formats

- DITA and Topic Oriented Content Creation

- Authoring and Content Creation for Reusable Data

- Innovative Publishing Business Models

- Improving Access to Government Publishing
Information

- Single Source Publishing Processes

- Case Studies on Open Publishing Technology
Adoption

If you are interested, please submit your ideas in
the Call For Papers 

section of the Web Site (http://openconferences.com/baltimore/cfp.html),

or contact me for further information.

Dale C. Waldt

+1.585.703.8440

President, aXtive Minds



-----Original Message-----

From: Michael Priestley [mailto:] 

Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 10:28 PM

To: Carol Geyer

Cc: 

Subject: Re: [docstandards-interop-tech] RE:
[odf-adoption] Please review

the

Docstandards InterOp Scenerio and possible venues

I'll be at DITA Europe, and could probably arrange
to be at one of XML or

Open

Publish. 

In order to make sure we have something to share
by that point, should we

have

a kickoff call to set schedules and priorities? I
have a telecon number we

can

use at least for the short term. 

Would it make sense to have a call some time the
week of June 26th? I'll be

away next week but hope to be checking email -
what days work best for an

on-going meeting? How often should we meet - once
a week, once a month? 

Perhaps we could start by posting introductions,
priorities (what are you

hoping for out of this activity), and preferred
meeting times. 

Thanks, 

Michael Priestley

IBM DITA Architect and Classification Schema PDT
Lead



http://dita.xml.org/blog/25 

"Carol Geyer"
<> 

06/06/2006 12:34 PM To

<>

cc

Subject

[docstandards-interop-tech] RE: [odf-adoption]
Please review the

Docstandards

InterOp Scenerio and possible venues

I assume the team could decide to stage the
InterOp twice--once in Europe

and

once in North America, right? 

 

Obviously, the upside would be additional exposure
and the downside would be

extra travel. It this an option worth considering?

 

--carol 

________________________________

From: Dee Schur [mailto:] 

Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 12:19 PM

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: [odf-adoption] Please review the
Docstandards InterOp Scenerio and

possible venues

I am posting the proposed scenario (as follows)
provided by Michael

Priestley

(thank you Michael) to the docstandards list. I am
also sending a list of

venues for potential participants to review and
send feedback to the list

please. As many of you know, the InterOps take a
lot of time and commitment

but

they are really popular with analyst, conference
attendees, end users and

public representatives. 

 

The possible venues are: 

DITA Europe 

http://www.infomanagementcenter.com/DITAeurope/

<http://www.infomanagementcenter.com/DITAeurope/>
 

 

OASIS Open Standards 

http://www.tekom.de/upload/alg/CfP%20OOSD.pdf

<http://www.tekom.de/upload/alg/CfP%20OOSD.pdf>
 

 

Open Publish 2006 

http://open-conferences.com/baltimore/

<http://open-conferences.com/baltimore/>

 

XML 2006 

XML 2006 

http://2006.xmlconference.org/ <http://2006.xmlconference.org/>
 

 

Thanks! 

Dee Schur 

Member Support 

www.oasis-open.org 

 

-----Original Message-----

From: Michael Priestley [mailto:] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 12:07 AM

To: Dee Schur

Cc: 'Carol Geyer'; 'Dee Schur'; 'Donald Harbison';
'Don Day';

;
; 'Michael Brauer - Sun

Germany - ham02 - Hamburg'; 'Norman Walsh'

Subject: Re: Discussion to advance
DITA/ODF/DocBooks InterOp Demo 

 

OK, finally got the outline done - harder than I
thought, even at a high

level,

to come up with something that didn't immediately
expose my utter ignorance

of

how the public sector works (please wait at least
an hour before gently

letting

me know that my efforts have been unsuccessful): 

- govt worker begins drafting a policy note in ODF
about the use of personal

data received via email 

- govt worker pulls in the text of the relevant
statute, which is in a DITA

specialization 

- govt worker pulls in the legal disclaimer which
must now be included in

every

government email reply, from a different DITA
specialization 

- govt worker pulls in the instructions on how to
include the text of the

disclaimer in emails, from documentation of the
email software written in

DocBook 

- technical author 1, using DITA, creates an
internal policy and procedures

website 

- and pulls in text from the DocBook email
software documentation 

- and pulls in the legal text from a DITA
specialization 

- and pulls in the relevant section of the policy
note, written in ODF 

- technical author 2, using DocBook, creates a
customized version of the

email

software documentation 

- and pulls in portions of the procedures web
site, in the form of DITA

topics

and ODF policy notes 

- as the legal disclaimer changes, or the policy
changes, or the email

software

changes, or the statute itself changes, all the
references can be updated

simply by rebuilding/republishing the content,
since all reuse is by

reference

not by copy-and-paste 

Now I'm off to sign on to the interop mailing
list. Let me know if there's

anything I need to change before going to the DITA
TC list with the

proposal.

Suggestions for improvement/corrections would be
very welcome. 

Michael Priestley

IBM DITA Architect and Classification Schema PDT
Lead



http://dita.xml.org/blog/25 

lease Date: 4/11/2006 

--

No virus found in this outgoing message.

Checked by AVG Free Edition.

Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.2/356 -
Release Date: 6/5/2006 

-- 

No virus found in this incoming message.

Checked by AVG Free Edition.

Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.1/369 -
Release Date: 6/19/2006

-- 

No virus found in this outgoing message.

Checked by AVG Free Edition.

Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.1/369 -
Release Date: 6/19/2006

---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe, e-mail:


For additional commands, e-mail:


--

No virus found in this incoming message.

Checked by AVG Free Edition.

Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.2/373 - Release Date: 6/22/2006

 

      

--

No virus found in this outgoing message.

Checked by AVG Free Edition.

Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.2/373 - Release Date: 6/22/2006