RE: [dss] Authentication in DSS

From
Qobert Yuccherato
Date
2003-01-26T02:03:17+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [dss] Authentication in DSS
Title: RE: [dss] Authentication in DSS

Burt;

It seems to me that in order to deal with the security requirements of the various environments where a digital signature service is likely to be deployed, any protocol that we develop should support:

1)  no authentication (well, really authentication provided by other means, or another layer, for example over TLS),

2)  authentication directly to the server within the protocol (using WS-Security maybe?),

3)  authentication using an authentication authority (using SAML?),

4)  combinations of above (in order to allow the two-authentication policy).

If others agree, I think this should be added as a requirement.

        Robert.

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Kaliski, Burt [mailto:]

> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:11 PM

> To: ''

> Subject: [dss] Authentication in DSS

> 

> 

> At the January 13 teleconference, I raised the question of 

> how requesters

> will be authenticated to a DSS service.

> 

> In some digital signature policies, authentication steps occur at two

> levels, initially to establish the valid identity corresponding to the

> signer's session and subsequently for individual digital 

> signatures that are

> to be applied. In a smart card environment, this corresponds 

> to the policy

> where a second PIN is required to approve a digital signature.

> 

> If the DSS service relies on an authentication authority 

> (e.g., SAML), the

> two-authentication policy could be achieved via two separate

> authentications. Alternatively, the DSS service could manage its own

> authentication (e.g., accept a PIN) in addition to a SAML 

> assertion from an

> authentication authority.

> 

> Key-splitting raises interesting authentication requirements. 

> If the DSS

> service cryptographically splits its signing key between two 

> servers, then

> each server needs assurance that the user has been 

> authenticated. If both

> servers rely on a single authentication authority, however, 

> then compromise

> of the authentication authority would undermine the benefits of

> key-splitting.

> 

> I'd be interested in hearing the group's suggestions on these 

> authentication

> issues.

> 

> -- Burt Kaliski

> RSA Laboratories

> 

> ----------------------------------------------------------------

> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription

> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>

>