dss_requirements_draft_12

At 10:35 AM 8/15/2003 +0100, Nick Pope wrote:
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>Trevor,
>
>The requirements document doesn't need to specify what the time-stamping
>protocol looks like.  The requirement is that we have a time-stamping
>protocol, whether it is just a profile of sign or its own protocol is open.
>
>For the moment in the Core document we do have a separate request / response
>for Time-stamping, so the statement does not reflect the current approach
>and so I suggest that this is removed.


I removed that sentence from 3.1.1, no other changes:

http://trevp.net/dss/dss_requirements_draft_12.pdf
http://trevp.net/dss/dss_requirements_draft_12.doc

I'll be travelling for the rest of August.  I'll try to call in for the 
meeting, but I won't have seen any discussions on the list.

Trevor