Trevor - OK. It looks like I forgot that bit. Any excuse to do a version
3!. Is the Hirsch spec. considered the basis for going forward? If so, we
could call it
oasis-dss-1.0-core-spec-wd-01
All the best. Tim.
-----Original Message-----
From: Trevor Perrin [mailto:]
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 11:22 PM
To: Tim Moses; 'DSS'
Subject: Re: [dss] Draft 02 of the object naming guidelines
At 03:31 PM 9/5/2003 -0400, Tim Moses wrote:
>Colleagues - Here is the second draft of the object naming guidelines,
>incorporating the best of the ideas discussed on the list. Maybe, we can
>consider adoption of these guidelines during our teleconference on Monday
>(item 7 on the agenda). All the best. Tim.
Looks good, though I didn't see it mentioned that "Part" could be omitted
on docs applicable to all the TC's activities?
Would these be good names for our current docs? -
oasis-dss-1.0-requirements-wd-12
oasis-dss-1.0-object-naming-guidelines-wd-02
oasis-dss-1.0-timestamp-token-schema-wd-01
oasis-dss-1.0-core-spec-hirsch-01
oasis-dss-1.0-core-schema-perrin-02
oasis-dss-1.0-core-spec-cruellas-01 [1]
oasis-dss-1.0-core-schema-cruellas-01 [2]
(The first would be Juan Carlos' document from 9/4. The second would
combine Juan Carlos' proposals for Signing and Verifying into a single
schema).
Trevor
