Re: [dss] Draft 02 of the object naming guidelines

At 08:21 PM 9/7/2003 -0700, Trevor Perrin wrote:
>At 03:31 PM 9/5/2003 -0400, Tim Moses wrote:
>
>>Colleagues - Here is the second draft of the object naming guidelines,
>>incorporating the best of the ideas discussed on the list.  Maybe, we can
>>consider adoption of these guidelines during our teleconference on Monday
>>(item 7 on the agenda).  All the best.  Tim.
>
>Looks good, though I didn't see it mentioned that "Part" could be omitted 
>on docs applicable to all the TC's activities?
>
>Would these be good names for our current docs? -
>
>
>oasis-dss-1.0-requirements-wd-12
>oasis-dss-1.0-object-naming-guidelines-wd-02
>
>oasis-dss-1.0-timestamp-token-schema-wd-01
>oasis-dss-1.0-core-spec-hirsch-01
>
>oasis-dss-1.0-core-schema-perrin-02
>
>oasis-dss-1.0-core-spec-cruellas-01    [1]
>oasis-dss-1.0-core-schema-cruellas-01    [2]
>(The first would be Juan Carlos' document from 9/4.  The second would 
>combine Juan Carlos' proposals for Signing and Verifying into a single schema).


If no one objects, I'll rename our documents like above tomorrow.

(Juan Carlos, this means combining your Signing and Verifying schemas into 
one - is that okay?)

Trevor