RE: [dss] plans for next draft

From
Rich Salz <>
Date
2003-11-19T13:03:04+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [dss] plans for next draft
> Agreed. But would we not be obliged to define at least the default Timestamp
> type (URI) in the core ?

Yes, we must be define *any* URI's that we specify in the spec.

In his note, I think Frederick was proposing we do what DSIG did, which is
define a "base URI"
	http://www.oasis-open.org/2003/dss#
And then a timestamp URI just adds a "fragment" to that, as in
	http://www.oasis-open.org/2003/dss#timestamp

I think OASIS prefers URN's, tho.  Something for our chairs to check up
on?
	/r$

--
Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway  http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview      http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html