At 10:29 PM 11/18/2003 -0500, Edward Shallow wrote:
>Number 4) below sounds good, but if you are going for extensibility why not
>further reduce ContentTimestamp and SignatureTimestamp to simply Timestamp
Good idea.
>defaulting to Signature Timestamp. Examples of flat Timestamp types:
>Content, Signature, SigAndRefs, RefsOnly, DataObjects, Archive.
Should we provide URIs for these, in the core spec?
I wouldn't mind omitting them, for now, and letting profiles define the
URIs they need. And then later on, we can decide if we want to refactor
some into the core.
Trevor
