At 02:53 PM 11/20/2003 -0500, Tim Moses wrote:
>Trevor - The urns have to be in the dss namespace. E.g.
>urn:oasis-open:dss:signatureType:rfc3275. All the best. Tim.
Tim,
2 questions about this:
1) I take it you think we should use URNs, instead of HTTP URLs (as we've
been doing), for the DSS namespace?
2) In SAML section 7, they say:
"Where possible an existing URN is used to specify a protocol. In the case
of IETF protocols the URN of the most current RFC that specifies the
protocol is used." For example, they use "urn:ietf:rfc:3275" for
authentications performed via XML-DSIG.
Is it your opinion that's a mistake, and *all* URIs we use should be from
our own namespace?
Trevor
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Trevor Perrin [mailto:]
>Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 4:44 AM
>To: Nick Pope
>Cc:
>Subject: RE: [dss] plans for next draft
>
>
>At 09:34 AM 11/20/2003 +0000, you wrote:
>
> >OK - can this type allow profiles, such as the Court Filing, to
> >identify new types.
>
>How about this? -
>
> <SignatureType type="urn:ietf:rfc:3275"> <!-- XML-DSIG -->
> <SignatureType type="urn:ietf:rfc:3369"> <!-- CMS -->
> etc..
>
>Trevor
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the
>OASIS TC), go to
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dss/members/leave_workgroup.php
>.
>
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
>the OASIS TC), go to
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dss/members/leave_workgroup.php.
