I would recommend simply providing a pointer to the page of the TC which
discloses IPR and indicate that that is the IPR of which we are aware to
date.
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: [dss] FW: [dss-comment] Public Comment
> From: "Nick Pope" <>
> Date: Fri, April 01, 2005 5:40 am
> To: "OASIS DSS TC" <>
>
> I propose the following response to the IPR question raised below.
>
> "Whilst it is not possible to make definitive statements regarding IPR we
> are not aware of any company requiring payment of royalties for use of the
> DSS core protocol."
>
> Nick Pope
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nick Pope [mailto:]
> > Sent: 21 March 2005 17:40
> > To: OASIS DSS TC
> > Subject: [dss] FW: [dss-comment] Public Comment
> >
> >
> > Forwarding FYI
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [mailto:]
> > Sent: 21 March 2005 11:12
> > To:
> > Subject: [dss-comment] Public Comment
> >
> >
> > Comment from:
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > I'm writing you because I would like to comment that in the new release of
> > the document, it is commented that in the enveloping signature there is a
> > new attribute ObjectId. However, this attribute is missing in the new
> > schema.
> >
> > The other comment is that I have some doubts about IPR statements. I have
> > being seen them, and I would like to know if the implementation of this
> > specification supposes the payment of some royalties to the
> > enterprise that
> > claims some IPR.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Antonio.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
