My ballot comments

It seems the ballot comment-form processing misbehaves when exposed to unescaped

'<' characters, presuambly treating what follows as (non-existent) html. I 

noticed this when the ballot was closed and was therefore not in a position to

make changes there. These are the original comments.

Regards,

Tommy

Lines 253 - 255 need attention as Manifest verification is now supported.

The fact that there is now both a <Schema> and a <Schemas> optional input

complicates things; I would prefer only <Schemas>. In particular, lines 305 to

316 seem to suffer.

The DocumentBaseType derivations should not mention info set items already

described in the supertype; e.g. lines 352 - 353 should be removed.

There are some semicolon's in the schema markup on lines 474, 475, 477, 478

that seem erronuous.

Remove 'two' from line 555.

Line 577 should refer to "optional input" not an "<OptionalInput>".

Line 639, should be RefURI.

RequestBaseType and ResponseBaseType are described as (abstract) elements in

the spec and complexType's in the schema; the schema is correct.

Line 1281 <Request> should be RequestBaseType.

There are a few occurences beginning with the phrase "Fehler!" throughout the

document.