Dear all,
I have not yet had a formal response but it looks like the on every page restriction is not about to be reconsidered.
My preference would therefore be to develop this specification as a regular standards-track document.
Pim
From: Pim van der Eijk [mailto:]
Sent: 19 August 2011 12:58
To:
Subject: RE: [ebcore] Initial Working Draft level starter document for Receipt and Delivery Notifications Version 1.0
Hello,
I have tried to use the new CND template, but in the process of doing so I found this new non-standards track has severe limitations. I wrote about this to several people and ended up posting an email to the OASIS Board:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/oasis-board-comment/201108/msg00011.html
I'll see what the response to it will be. One option is to reposition the document as a technical specification. (After all, there is no requirement that an OASIS spec has a least one MUST or SHOULD). Other suggestions are welcome.
Pim
From: Pim van der Eijk [mailto:]
Sent: 02 August 2011 13:48
To:
Subject: RE: [ebcore] Initial Working Draft level starter document for Receipt and Delivery Notifications Version 1.0
Hello,
My intention was to reformat my private draft using the new CN template, but due to an issue with the template I cannot use it right now.
As today was basically the only day I could work on this before our TC meeting next week, I am sending my private draft (which used the template based on the CS template) to the list. Any future work can be done using the CN template, once it is ready for use.
As a reminder, I initially wrote this document as background documentation for some end user communities that are working on document exchange protocols, but it could be more generally useful.
Pim
From: Paul Knight [mailto:]
Sent: 31 July 2011 23:07
To:
Subject: [ebcore] Initial Working Draft level starter document for Receipt and Delivery Notifications Version 1.0
Per the TC's submission request [1], please find the attached starter document for:
Receipt and Delivery Notifications Version 1.0 WP-abbrev: rdn
The expected URI pattern:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ebcore/rdn/v1.0/cnd01/rdn-v1.0-cnd01.odt
This is the first instance in which this Non-Standards Track Work Product template has been constructed in the OpenOffice Writer ODT format, and I would like to hear about any issues you may encounter with it. Please let me know if anything here fails to meet your expectations. Further revisions to this Work Product must be maintained in Working Drafts, following procedures detailed in the TC Handbook [2]. Working Drafts should be made available by uploading the document(s) to the TC's Kavi document repository, or (provisionally/temporarily) to the TC's Subversion (SVN) repository, if SVN has been activated for your TC [3]. TCs are encouraged to use ZIP packaging when the WD releases contain multiple files (and directories). For each WD revision, you will need to: 1) increment the Working Draft revision (number) from 01 to 02, 03, 04 etc., as successive Working Drafts are produced; the revision number needs to be updated at the top of the document in the stage identifier (Working Draft ##) and in the document identifier within the page footer. 2) supply the relevant publication/release/upload date for each successive Working Draft instance, using the prescribed date format: DD Month YYYY; the date needs to be updated at the top of the document (just below the stage identifier, Working Draft ##) and in the page footer. 3) provide suitable text for a document Abstract, updating this summary with successive revisions to provide an accurate description of the subject matter, goals, scope, etc. 4) keep the Acknowledgments (Appendix A) and Revision History (Appendix C) up-to-date with each WD revision. 5) consult the OASIS Naming Directives document when creating new artifacts that may be part of the Work Product (e.g., image files, XML schemas), observing the rules for name characters in files and proposed directories, and for proposed URIs/namespaces [4]. When the TC votes [5] to approve a Working Draft as a Committee Draft (CSD or CND), the Chair or other designated person must submit a Committee Specification Draft Creation and Upload Request
accessible on the TC Administration Requests Page [6]. Upon receipt of this form, the TC Administrator will QC and process the Work Product for official publication in the OASIS Library as a Committee Draft ( http://docs.oasis-open.org/ ), including addition of the requisite cover page metadata and other boilerplate information, as described in the TC Handbook. [7]
===========
References:
[1] http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/TCADMIN-604
[2] Working Drafts http://docs.oasis-open.org/TChandbook/Reference/WorkingDrafts.html
[3] SVN Version control, via Tools
http://tools.oasis-open.org/
[4] OASIS Naming Directives http://docs.oasis-open.org/specGuidelines/ndr/namingDirectives.html
[5] Approval of a WD as a CD (CSD or CND) http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process-2010-07-28.php#committeeDraft
[6] TC Administration Requests Page, see Committee Specification Draft Creation / Upload Request http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/TCAdminRequests15-10-2010.html
[7] Committee Specification Drafts and Committee Note Drafts http://docs.oasis-open.org/TChandbook/Reference/CommitteeSpecDrafts.html http://docs.oasis-open.org/TChandbook/Reference/CommitteeNoteDrafts.html
Best wishes, Paul
--
Paul Knight -
Tel: +1 781-861-1013
OASIS - Advancing open standards for the information society Document Process Analyst
