One thing that I would like to see be given more emphasis in this
proposed charter is potential interaction with other groups. The
proposed charter states:
"There have been other groups that have worked on specialized
architectures that use concepts of SOA in the past. We currently do not
see the requirements for establishing a liaison with those groups.
Liaisons may be decided by team consensus based on needs."
Could we perhaps do a bit better than that? For example, perhaps we can
have liaisons with TCs such as WS BPEL, WS-CAF, ebXML Registry (already
taken care of by proposed membership), UDDI, and perhaps others.
Otherwise, it looks like we're a standalone committee that has no
"integration points".
Happy Holidays!
Joe
Joseph Chiusano
Booz Allen Hamilton
Strategy and Technology Consultants to the World
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Duane Nickull [mailto:]
> Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 2:50 PM
> To: ebSOA OASIS TC
> Subject: [ebsoa] SOA Reference Model Charter
>
> Attached are the charter and two documents. The current plan
> is to propose these by the first week of January. ONly those
> who have given explicit permission that they be listed as
> founding members are named on the charter. If you want to be
> there and your name is not, please let me know.
>
> Duane
>
> --
> ***********
> Senior Standards Strategist - Adobe Systems, Inc. -
> http://www.adobe.com Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT Bureau Plenary -
> http://www.unece.org/cefact/ Chair - OASIS eb SOA TC -
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=ebsoa
> ***********
>
>
