FW: Latest Specification document

From
Miller, Robert (GXS) <>
To
,
Date
2000-05-02T18:15:55Z
ID
<F2A665AC0054D1119D0F00805FFECA1204717243@roc01bxgeisge>
Thread
FW: Latest Specification document
Hi All,

The Architecture Document (Section 3.5.5 a)(TechArch group) currently
proposes that an ebXML document be framed within an 'ebXML' element. 
TR&P is referenced in an Editor's note to this rule. See below:

  a)      The message will use a root tag of <ebXML> to identify it as an
ebXML compliant transaction.

  [EDITORS NOTE:  THE TRP GROUP MUST EITHER ADOPT THIS OR SPECIFY AN
ALTERNATIVE IDENTIFICATION ELEMENT OR METHOD]

I do not support this means of identification, and propose instead that an
XML conformant document include a 'Processing Instruction' asserting ebXML
compliance.  I suggest:

	<?ebXML version='1.0' reference='someURI'>

where 'version' provides the ebXML version to which compliance is claimed,
and 
      'reference' provides a URI for use in accessing a repository of
metadata relating to this message. 

I believe this approach is less intrusive upon XML syntax.  It eliminates
the need, if a DTD (or other schema declaration)is used, to define an ebXML
element and its allowed content.

Cheers,
        Bob