>Also, we hope to generate the
>interfaces for an ebXML Registry and Repository based on our UML model
using
>XMI and XSL.
Are you sure you want to go down this path with xsl? The performance hit is
really not worth it IMHO. Can you elaborate on the interfaces you want to
expose?
>The biggest problems we saw with the XMI spec is 1) the mandatory
><XMI>..</XMI> tags which I am currently ignoring in the test XSL, as well
as
>2) ordering which I believe is a general problem with the model instance
>philosophy anyhow.
Scott, what is your take on whether "consistent" results can be obtained
using this approach? If ten people in ten different parts of the world do
the same XMI 1.1 meta data interchange from UML to an XML syntax, will they
get one result or ten different results for the same process?
Duane Nickull
