Re: FW: Conversations, or BP alignment with TR&P and Architecture

From
David RR Webber <>
To
Robert Dakin <>
Date
2000-07-03T20:55:53Z
ID
<200007031646_MC2&#45;AB06&#45;>
Thread
Re: FW: Conversations, or BP alignment with TR&P and Architecture
Robert,

You being Australian and all I would have thought that bottom-up 
and top-down are purely relative!!!

DW.
p.s. I have one of those Globes too with the Antipodes in the
correct spatial orientation position.

=========================================================
Message text written by Robert Dakin
>
>[snipped]
>The layer we are focused on right now is the data element layer.  The
>transactional layer is built upon that.

Is this a good idea?  I would have thought that requirements for 
the data element layer should emerge from the transactional 
layer.  Whatever happened to top down design?

My .02 worth.
Robert Dakin<


=======================================================================
= This is ebxml-architecture, the general mailing list for the ebXML  =
= Architecture project team. The owner of this list is                =
= [email protected]                             =
=                                                                     =
= To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected] with    =
= the following in the body of the message:                           =
=      unsubscribe ebxml-architecture                                 =
= If you are subscribed using a different email address, put the      =
= address you subscribed with at the end of the line; e.g.            =
=      unsubscribe ebxml-architecture [email protected]              =
=======================================================================