hello joe, etc..
i just noticed that there is a 'later' requirements doc on the site at:
http://www.ebxml.org/specdrafts/ReqSpecv1-0.pdf
- it links off the page...
http://www.ebxml.org/specindex2.htm
- however this is titled:
electronic business XML (ebXML)
Requirements Specification Version 1.0
ebXML Requirements Specification 12 May 2000
- whereas the one voted on was dated 11 May 2000.
i presume this one is up for approval at the plenary.
Joseph Baran wrote:
> Chris:
>
> The URL you provided does indeed have copies of the Requirements document
> in various formats.
>
> However, the version of the document is _not_ the version which was
> approved at the Brussels plenary.
>
> It is apparently the April 28th version which was originally offered for a
> vote on Monday, but was then withdrawn and revised during the week in
> Brussels.
> The revision which was actually approved was distributed in Brussels in
> hardcopy, but I (like William) have never been able to find it in a file
> form posted anywhere at all.
>
> If anyone knows of one, I (and others) would certainly appreciate a link to
> it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joe Baran
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Ferris [SMTP:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 5:03 PM
> To: William J. Kammerer
> Cc: ebXML Requirements; ebXML-Architecture List
> Subject: Re: ebXML metamodel write-up
>
> http://www.ebxml.org/specindex1.htm
>
> This is the URL for the requirements document,
> even if it still is listed as Draft status.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Chris
>
> "William J. Kammerer" wrote:
> >
> > Duane Nickull says the discovery stuff - i.e., identifying which trading
> > partners are capable of engaging into a given electronic business
> > transaction and who provide certain products and services - is
> > "explicitly out of scope of ebXML." Further, "The discovery phase has
> > not been addressed in the TA Spec nor have they been included in any
> > discussions. I did not recall it being included in the Requirements
> > Document which mandated our Technical Architecture Specification."
> >
> > This is what I thought was in all the Requirements drafts before
> > Brussels. Who took it out? Will we ever know? -the Requirements
> > document approved at the Brussels plenary is not available at
> > http://www.ebxml.org/specindex.htm. It's not available at the
> > Requirements Project Team working directory, either. Does anybody know
> > where it is? Did we lose it?
> >
> > William J. Kammerer
> > FORESIGHT Corp.
> > 4950 Blazer Memorial Pkwy.
> > Dublin, OH USA 43017-3305
> > +1 614 791-1600
> >
> > Visit FORESIGHT Corp. at http://www.foresightcorp.com/
> > "Commerce for a New World"
>
> --
> _/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ Christopher Ferris - Enterprise Architect
> _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ Phone: 781-442-3063 or x23063
> _/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ Email: [email protected]
> _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ Sun Microsystems, Mailstop: UBUR03-313
> _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ 1 Network Drive Burlington, MA 01803-0903
--
regards
tim mcgrath
TEDIS fremantle western australia 6160
phone: +618 93352228 fax: +618 93352142
begin:vcard
n:McGrath;Tim
tel;pager:+61(0)299633829
tel;cell:+61 (0)438352228
tel;fax:+61(0)893352142
tel;work:+61(0)893352228
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:[email protected]
x-mozilla-cpt:;-19376
fn:tim mcgrath
end:vcard
