Re: Submission of new TA specification DRAFT

MArty:

Thank you for the prompt reply and comments.  After reading these,  I
don;t think we would have any problem changing the section as per your
comments.  This would still meet our needs of specifying the functional
requirements for the TPP team.  If we change these items,  do you feel
that our spec would meet your needs and enable you to complete your
work?  

We wish to get each of the teams to basically review the generic
sections plus the section that applies specifically to their domain
(scope).  I feel we could very easily reach this consensus.  
Rik:  The Transport stuff is largely based on a working liaison between
our teams.  I believe it should meet with your approval however, can you
please revisit it briefly.

Lisa:  Please look at the COre Components, CBO's and there are also a
couple of implementation issues that touch on run time context and
design principles.  PLease let us know your comments ASAP (even though
this document hasn;t received official submission status from the QA
Team, I want to get the ball rolling.)

On a personal note - I am very excited about the latest specification. 
I think we are well on our way to meeting our targets for Vancouver.  I
want to thank all those who have taken the time to aide the TA Team in
this presentation.  Everyone has been very instrumental in the
collaboration you see before you.

Duane Nickull