Re: Re: OTA Tag name rules

From
Bruce Peat <>
To
David RR Webber <>
Date
2000-09-30T12:44:08Z
ID
<004201c02adb$d0b98f00$d403fea9@eps>
Thread
Re: Re: OTA Tag name rules
I believe the version doesn't get placed on 1.0 version of anything.
Version only counts when you have two of something.

- Bruce


----- Original Message -----
From: "David RR Webber" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Bruce Peat" <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>; "Christopher Ferris"
<[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2000 12:48 AM
Subject: more: Re: OTA Tag name rules


Message text written by David RR Webber
>
Bruce,

I have to major disagree on all this.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Oh, I also forgot the simple pragmatic view.

We know that 95% of semantic definitions are static
from the BSR work and others - and that for the 5%
that changes - most are not changed - but instead
new items are created that deprecate the originals.

Given that practical view - why the heck would we
want to stick everything in sight with a version tag,
when we fully know that 90%+ of these will never
be used?!

KISS here and business reality.

Thanks, DW.